Image courtesy of adamr at FreeDigitalPhotos.net |
Although this research article's title is certainly published in jest, there is an underlying more serious message.
In any case, the argument goes like this:
• FACT: Humans constantly shed skin flakes and germs from the skin. Wearing clothing like scrubs actively rub the skin aggravating the skin shedding with germs which can disseminate into the air.
• FACT: Naked humans shed less skin and germs than clothed humans.
• Therefore, naked surgeons would lead to a more sterile environment for operating on patients and decrease infection risk.
The study also found that male surgeons shed twice as much germs as women and that women wearing tights in the operating room shed more than those with bare legs.
In spite of the clear benefits from an infection standpoint, it is doubtful that surgical procedures will ever be performed with naked surgeons assisted by naked nurses and naked support staff.
And if hospital and government policies ever change in order to enforce naked surgery in the name of patient safety, I'm not sure the operating room culture would ever change to the point where snarky comments, inappropriate giggling, and staring would disappear to allow for the serious business of safe and competent surgery.
Reference:
Naked Surgeons? The Debate About What to Wear in the O.R. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 May 29. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix498. [Epub ahead of print]
1 comment:
They'd get used to it quick. Long ago I got a job as a barback in a busy strip club. The first couple shifts I was distracted by all the "nekkid wimmin" but by the end of the week I was more concerned about backing the bartenders who were fair with tips and figuring out which one's to let fare on their own. It became a standard work environment just like any other.
CLICK to Post a Comment